North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
* frnkblk@xxxxxxxxx (Frank Bulk) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:24 CET]:
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning beyond adding more "channel blankets".
I understand Foundry's wireless products do the same thing. Seems to work ok but have not heard about larger test cases than a hundred or so clients.
* carl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Carl Karsten) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 05:56 CET]:
On Wifi for 1000:[..]
In the context of that, you may wish to peruse the proceedings of the last few CCC Congresses in Berlin, which had pretty much working wireless - even with thousands of attendees:
http://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Fahrplan/attachments/1347-Camp07-NetworkReview.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/attachments/1247-23c3-noc-review-corrected.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2005/fahrplan/attachments/652-slides_network_review.pdf
(They're still looking for a sponsor of wireless equipment for this year's edition, by the way)
"The Mac doesn't have a one-button mouse, it has a five-button mouse, with four of the buttons on the keyboard."
-- Peter da Silva <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>