North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
* iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx (Iljitsch van Beijnum) [Mon 05 May 2008, 10:09 CEST]: > PS. Am I the only one who is annoyed by the reduction in usable > subject space by the superfluous [NANOG]? No, and I'm just as annoyed by the (non-McQ) footer with superfluous information attached to each mail. On 5 mei 2008, at 17:14, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > Those of us who are *really* annoyed by stuff like that usually cook > up a procmail recipe to strip it out.. :) That will only lead to duplicates of "Re: " (before and after the tag) in the Subject, I'm afraid. -- Niels. -- _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@xxxxxxxxx http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog