North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

  • From: Robert E. Seastrom
  • Date: Wed May 21 22:24:59 2008 
It's always been possible to get resources by lying or committing
fraud - the common law crime of obtaining property by false pretenses
predates the Internet by a substantial margin.

                                        ---rob

"Tony Varriale" <tvarriale@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yup.  You can horde.
>
> You can easily justify a /23 these days and not be multihomed still
> get a /22.
>
> tv
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Pete Templin" <petelists@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <nanog@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?
>
>
>> Tony Varriale wrote:
>>> Thanks for the info.  We needed larger than /22 anyways.
>>>
>>> I am a bit surprised that they will hand out a small allocaiton for
>>> multihomers.  These days it's very easy to do.  And, could be a
>>> easy way to horde some v4.
>>
>> Nope, you can horde a /24 for a single device, but it's
>> provider-assigned. If you can't justify a /23 -now-, you don't
>> qualify for an ARIN multihomers' /22.
>>
>> pt