North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38
On Sep 11, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
FWIW, based on off-list discussion, Jo's disagreement seems to stem from a misunderstanding of how loose uRPF works (he didn't know it accepts any packet that has a route in the routing table).
Um, no. Because if you put loose mode uRPF on your edges you aren't implementing BCP38 now are you?
I don't care how it is deployed. That's your job ;-)
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness