North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: What is the most standard subnet length on internet
On 23/12/2008, at 6:40 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
I help a buddy who works for a small ISP. I believe they're ignoring or
That sort of thing is common, sure (unfortunately).
My question (comment?) is more around why people would filter /24 (or whatever) prefixes (ie. when advertised a /24 prefix over BGP not accept it, so they do not get a route for that /24), and then not have a default. That route is used for outgoing packets, not incoming ones (modulo RPF, etc.).
The purpose of filtering the /24s is to keep the size of their RIB/FIB down, not to limit abuse or something. If you are close to the edge of the network, filtering /24s is a low hanging fruit way to catch a whole lot of pointless routes that don't really gain you much performance benefit, but are going to cost you lots of RIB/FIB space. However, you really need to have a covering default, so you still have some way to reach the people in those /24s.
From: Skywing [mailto:Skywing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Yep, that is what I'm interested in.
It would be perhaps an interesting exercise to only accept prefixes for which you do not have a covering prefix with the same next-hop, etc. I wonder if router vendors already do that internally as an optimisation when installing routes in to the forwarding hardware?
You would have to still have the routes in your RIB but RIB RAM is cheap(er).
-- Nathan Ward