|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Level 3 issues
I have heard this story several times. The train derailment was yesterday in New York unless it has not made it to news.google.com on a search for train derail. Issues did not start until 1030 MST. It seems highly unlikely that a train derailment yesterday caused major network issues today. -----Original Message----- From: Alex H. Ryu [mailto:r.hyunseog@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 2:44 PM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Derek Bodner; nanog@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Level 3 issues It seems that there was fiber cut because of train derailment around NY area. Alex Blake Pfankuch wrote: > Any word on the actual cause of the issue? > > From: Derek Bodner [mailto:subscribedlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:53 AM > To: Blake Pfankuch > Cc: Jon Wolberg; Jason Cheslock; nanog@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Level 3 issues > > Looks like most providers here in the east coast are routing through level3 again, and I'm not seeing any packet loss or latency anymore. > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bpfankuch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Seems to be normalizing here in Colorado as well, however still having occasional packet loss to NY. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:40 AM > To: Jason Cheslock > Cc: nanog@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nanog@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Level 3 issues > > Confirmed here as well. > > > Jon > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Cheslock" <sangreviento@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sangreviento@xxxxxxxxx>> > To: "marco" <marco@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:marco@xxxxxxxxxx>> > Cc: nanog@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nanog@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:35:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: Level 3 issues > > According to L3, this issue should be fixed and we should start seeing > > >> the traffic normalizing. >> Can anyone confirm? >> > > Here in Richmond Virginia, everything seems to be back to normal now. > Traffic coming from my Comcast connection can get through L3 now. > > > 7 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net<http://te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net> [68. > 86.91.121] > 8 10 ms 11 ms 12 ms xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.79.231 > .9] > 9 12 ms 17 ms 18 ms vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net<http://vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.68.17.190] > > 10 12 ms 17 ms 17 ms ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.1 > 85] > 11 16 ms 26 ms 16 ms ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.132.94] > 12 32 ms 30 ms 17 ms ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.74] > > 13 15 ms 19 ms 16 ms ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.68.16.142] > > > > -- > Derek Bodner > subscribedlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:subscribedlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >
|