Link to presentation by Randy Bush, IIJ
Link to presentation by Steve Feldman, CNET
Link to presentation by Betty Burke, Merit
Link to presentation by Rob Seastrom, ClueTrust
o What subjects might interest the members but are not at the meeting because the talks were rejected by the PC
o Should the PC keep and publish minutes? With what content? - shows and no-shows - who is active in recruiting talks
o Transparency in PC review process, should the reviews be signed as opposed to anonymous?
o Should PC members be assigned to shepherd talks to help authors tune their talks earlier in the development process?
o What should the mid- long-term direction of NANOG be?
o How should we deal with attendees from the press - Attendance fee - Photography
o Two or three meetings a year?
o ML AUP change
| 8. Challenge/response sender whitelisting software which requires interaction by any party to validate a post to the NANOG mailing list as non-spam shall be treated by the list administration team like any other condition that generates a bounce message. Subscribers with software (such as but not limited to TMDA) that is (mis) configured in this fashion are subject to removal from the list without notice, and are welcome to resubscribe at such time as their software is fixed. |