North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Routing wars pending?
> Absolutely agree with both Robert and Vadim that DNS need to be revised > in a big way. I especially would like to see the MX record concept > applied to information services (IX maybe), i.e. [...] That's not a big revision. "Big" revisions usually entail wire protocol changes. What you want is called a "SRV" record and it was submitted to the RFC Editor for "extended last call" (befitting its experimental status) about a week ago. An earlier version can be had from any Internet Drafts repository as draft-gulbrandsen-dns-rr-srvcs-01.txt. > Has this simple concept been proposed in an IETF draft unknown to > us ugly ducklings :-) > > Quack. > > Tim Tim, next time I'd like you to do three things differently: (1) do your homework before posting widely (2) post to big-internet or nanog but not both (3) only include one copy of your .signature Paul