North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)

  • From: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
  • Date: Thu Jul 07 15:29:02 2005


I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
misunderstood your point...


- ferg

-- Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:

[re: shim6]

the effort is relying on IPv6 and on the disappearance of NATs, for v6.  one 
might consider these to be critical dependencies that are rather risky.

"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 [email protected] or [email protected]
 ferg's tech blog: