North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: OT: Xen
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:11:32AM +1000, Matthew Palmer <[email protected]> wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > Fairly well -- a lot better than (eg) vservers, and almost certainly > better than UMLs. Because they are different virtualisation solutions with different requirments. If you have unrelated customers, who do not trust each other, Xen (or UML) is OK. If you just want to put one service on a different machine but do not have the money (or the rack space) to dedicate a box to just DHCP, Linux Vservers or FreeBSD jails are fine.