North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)

  • Date: Wed May 30 16:43:25 2007

That's why I was not in favor of PI neither critical infrastructures with

It will take time, but hopefully everybody will place the right filters.


> De: Donald Stahl <[email protected]>
> Responder a: <[email protected]>
> Fecha: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:12:54 -0400 (EDT)
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]>
> CC: Nanog <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
>> But now PI is there, no more restrictions in the path, so they can use
>> "traditional" multihoming :-)
> If ARIN is going to assign /48's, and people are blocking anything longer
> than /32- well then that's a problem :)
> -Don

The IPv6 Portal:

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.