North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers
On Dec 24, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
I think the point is that RA and VRRPv6 are not designed to depend on each
other in any way.
While you can certainly run both on any given segment, it is hard to imagine
many cases where one would want to do so.
In places where all you need is to know a valid gateway that can do the right
thing with your packets, RA is probably the right solution. This, generally,
turns out to be the vast majority of LAN segments. Clearly, RA is intended
only for scenarios where a gateway is a gateway is a gateway.
In places where you need tighter control over the usage of various gateways
on a common L2 segment, VRRP probably makes more sense. However,
as things currently stand, that means static routing configuration on the host
since for reasons passing understanding, DHCP6 specifically won't do
I don't know the state of the current VRRP6 draft or protocol, but, I can't
imagine what would be left in VRRP6 if it couldn't be statically configured
without RA. If that's the case, then, what would it possibly do, exactly, that
would be different from RA without VRRP?